FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Can i please invite you to it?

      Loading editor
  • Hey, why are you deleting so many interesting articles from actual speculative books?

      Loading editor
    • The reason why I have deleted these articles is because you have only transcribed the same text of the book, which is something that isn't accepted anymore in this wiki, people are asked if they are going to do an article, they must do their best to summarize the content in an descriptive or encyclopedic way without trying to just copy the same text, this to avoid problems with copyright and as respect for the content of the book.

      Also and to make it clear it is not necessary to make individual pages for ecosystems, in the main page of the book there are already place that can be filled with this information as they do not cover too much content (of course, by not just copying the same text from the book)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • While,yes we cant update depiction of these animals, you did do remakes for the speculative dinosaurs from The New Dinosaurs. Perhaps you could do remakes of certain groups of dinosaurs from the Spec Dinosauria project. While yes we cant show them on here as were only using information we find, it would be interesting to see what they would look like with the knowledge we currently have.

      Loading editor
    • Honestly, I do not have the desire to do it, I do it with the new dinosaurs because they are exaggeratedly derived, with specworld there is not much that feeling

        Loading editor
    • Alright....also i commented on your latest redesign. It was a question that asks something interesting.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • why can't i comment on any of the articles?

      Loading editor
    • The comments were removed since in most cases they were used for spam, in addition to several people posting anything or trying to respond to chains of conversations that had been inactive for several years without reasons.

      Responding other thing...

      "should the boatbuilders have their own page?"

      No, as the boatbuilders are just a variant of the same species.

      And about something else, I saw that you tried to make a page for the hitek, and the effort is appreciated, however, the way in which you tried to do it is something that is no longer acceptable here, just copy and paste the text of the book without working on a description it is not already allowed, even though we have several pages with such a way of working but because there are many and we have not been able to remove everything, it is just lazy, please do not try to do that again. The page on the hitek is going to be put again but in another way.

      For other things welcome to the wiki, hope you can help us and you can enjoy the experience.

        Loading editor
    • Dragontunders wrote:
      The comments were removed since in most cases they were used for spam, in addition to several people posting anything or trying to respond to chains of conversations that had been inactive for several years without reasons.

      Responding other thing...

      "should the boatbuilders have their own page?"

      No, as the boatbuilders are just a variant of the same species.

      And about something else, I saw that you tried to make a page for the hitek, and the effort is appreciated, however, the way in which you tried to do it is something that is no longer acceptable here, just copy and paste the text of the book without working on a description it is not already allowed, even though we have several pages with such a way of working but because there are many and we have not been able to remove everything, it is just lazy, please do not try to do that again. The page on the hitek is going to be put again but in another way.

      For other things welcome to the wiki, hope you can help us and you can enjoy the experience.

      i assumed youcould do that because i had seen it on other articles but thanks!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • It's one of your Watchers on Deviantart, methinks you'll recognize my little icon in the top right corner. Anyway, I'm messaging you because I've rekindled my love of speculative evolution. And with a fresh, new look into how evolution works (I'm actually pretty embarrassed by what I passed off as work the last time I was here), I was hoping that I could mayhaps gain some knowledge about this place since I've gone. You know, some of the do's and don'ts that've popped up since it's clear that the formatting has changed quite a bit since I was first on here so long ago.

    Before you answer, yes, I did look at that little advice post about the do's and dont's, but I'm still a little confused on the specifics of it. You seem to be quite knowledged on subject, so feel free to answer this when you have the time.

      Loading editor
  • So....I see you decided to revert to the outdated Moanasaurus depiction, is there a reaosn for that? Like, that Moanasaurus lacks the tail fluke that we now know is present on mosasaurs, I tried to find a good updated picture of Moanasaurus but the only updated ones were sort of not that good, either in a white background and too small to really make out details, or looks less like a real animal and more like a drawing. So I had to use tylosaurus since It had a good looking,updated picture. I didn't want to mislead people into thinking of tylosaurus being Moanasaurus either, so I changed the name from Moanasaurus mangahouangae to Tylosaurus pembinensis......

      Loading editor
    • We can not make changes of this type because we only "maintain" the content of the project in this site, we can not modify any information unless the original creators of the project do it for themselves, despite that representation of mosasaurus is "outdated" as well no much people doesnt know about Moanasaurus, it remains as part of the essence and content of the original work, something that can not simply be updated. 

      So far I can let edit stuffs related with corrections of grammar, but not change of the main original content even if it looks outdated on this point of time.

        Loading editor
    • ah okay

        Loading editor
    • In other words, science has marched too far on for an overhaul.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • the Hybodontiformes are considered to be a extinct order of sharks in our timeline.while they are still around in this time line, won't they still be considered sharks?

      Loading editor
  • ^-----look there(an no, not at my name, the thing above my name)

      Loading editor
  • You say you want to redo certain articles. Why delete some of them? Why not just rewrite them without deleting them. It's kind of dumb the way you're doing it, no offense.

      Loading editor
    • You're talking about those that have only few sentences as content or the specific ones about the humans of Man After Man? Also for a point are deleted, some doesnt need any edition because aren't valuable enough or informative, and require work from 0.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message